Thursday

Avatar in 3D


Given the religious and mythological cosmologies I'm familiar with, especially native American, I have come away from my three viewings of Avatar pondering the impact this film might have - globally speaking. On the one hand, it is just a film: plastic layers coated with metallic patterns of digital information, dependent on a fragile combination of technologies that project a tale and a setting that, like the human characters it portrays - breathing canned air on an alien world, cannot survive outside the special confines of the theater. It can't even be viewed by most of our own worlds' population, which lacks access to, among other things more crucial, modern cinema. But then, they are not the ones trashing and shooting up the planet.


From those who are able to attend this film, what tangible, lasting effect will there be for planet Earth and the life it sustains? Will there be a halo effect perhaps, that tends towards illumination of the sacred within the lives we lead, or, like Frost's path that diverged in the woods, a shift in direction away from the unpromising path we, as humanity's elite members (pawns?) of techno-industrial-military culture, now tread? Will Avatar fly beyond the the reach of the devices and interests which tended its birth and incarnate where most needed, move freely in our world, and show the impact of its primal truth by virtue of a shift not only in the attitude and actions of individuals but of governments? A shift towards sanity (per Mo'at)?




"We stand now where two roads diverge. But unlike the roads in Robert Frost's familiar poem, they are not equally fair. The road we have long been traveling is deceptively easy, a smooth superhighway on which we progress with great speed, but at its end lies disaster. The other fork of the road—the one "less traveled by"—offers our last, our only chance to reach a destination that assures the preservation of the earth." Rachel Carson (1907 - 1964)




Let me explain, in case you have not seen this gorgeous film (And if not, please see it now rather than let me spill the beans), that it bears no simple category, no resemblance to any one "type" of story, cannot be anticipated even by viewing the trailers. Yes, it is a love story; yes, a science fiction tale; yes, comparable to, yet uncontained by, the mythic genre Joseph Campbell explored in,"Hero with a Thousand Faces"; and yes, an emotionally powerful political statement - at once reflecting other potent stories of literature and film, self referential of James Cameron's other films, and mimicking actual world history by using eerily familiar camera techniques, contextual clues and artifacts. Yet transcendence of categories, of what is material, mortal, trapped in any particular time or any particular location, ties Avatar's beginning to its end the way Ariadne's string led Theseus through the labyrinth. A focus on spirit carries the film beyond the ordinary, cheap, manipulative, cliche, and proscriptive consumerist (racist, ageist, misogynist...) agenda found in Hollywood films, even while reflecting them, as an authentic artistic choice. The astounding 3D experience - akin I must guess to that of viewing the first rock mural, first oil painting, or first moving picture - helps with this. But only, perhaps, if you believe; if you fully enter the film.


There are video games, t-shirts, action figures, and the like associated with this movie just as with the typical pap of big studios. The male lead (Jake) is a paraplegic by virtue of his service as a Marine; none of the reviews I have read have mentioned the basic fact that he happens to be a Marine (as in USMC) who takes his code of ethics as a Marine to heart and acts on it. This is in stark contrast to the other soldiers portrayed, reminiscent of the "Blackwater" mercenaries of Iraq, who are involved for not very good reasons. His ethics, his spirit, hold up regardless of material circumstances - even that of his inhabiting another material body than his original. 


Avatar holds up a magic mirror to many films, including Oliver Stone's, "Born on the Fourth of July". The unforgivably poor treatment of real life disabled vets is
clearly a part of the scathing indictment articulated by Cameron of the imperialist and corrupt system that honors Wall Street Executives more than members of the armed forces. Yet even this - what Cameron calls and I agree is patriotic symbolism - is subsumed by the larger message of the film, and does not distract. What seems at one level of consideration a use of what is iconic, of stock characters set in dualistic rigor mortis, of myth lacking diversity, and of the trivia, gadgetry, and unhelpful stereotypes, is upended not least by choosing a disabled person to portray the one who can articulate the message crucial for others to hear. He has attained insight by virtue of his disability experience - not only as a para and a bilingual-bicultural inhabitant of an alien body disabled by his human upbringing, but as his own twin who has no time for pity - this is part of what delivers a message beyond the confines of all cultural trappings, the story that escapes film to lodge in the heart, that we know immediately as essential truth. It is he who sees clearly, upon whom words that are chosen to manipulate and paint a false image have little effect. He is the outsider who can reconcile what seems beyond reconciliation; balance the forces by embodying the bits of light and dark within themselves, bridge the space age and neolithic races, the scientific and pagan, and is the only one in a position to appreciate the fact that over and above myth, legend, and "reality", all really is one. A vision he has whilst imbibing some sort of concoction of insects - in the script but edited out of the film, probably due to concerns of it being misunderstood as endorsing drug use - clues him in to how he
will do this.


The Na'vi, the native population with whom he eventually identifies, whom he is destined to help, have lost a key element of what it is they continue to practice culturally, spiritually, yet by rote, until Jake, seeing what they cannot with his fresh eyes, recovers it for them. And yet, there is an independent individual, a Na'vi named Neytiri, who sees that he sees, and who apparently has been seeking such vision on her own, and probably would have found it had he not arrived. Her sister had been shot by the invading force after she sabotaged a bulldozer involved in clear cutting. Neytiri seeks a separate path. She senses Jake's decency, honesty, and brave heart. All of his potential to perform his outsider role would be lost, except that she recognizes it. She saves him, not for the first time, and on orders from her mom, the shaman, who recognizes the meaning of what her daughter has seen, Neytiri trains him in the ways of the people. She "sees" him, as he "sees" her due to mutually shared qualities including a great heart; they are - in fact - both individuals and part of a whole.


The Na'vi look and move like cats, Neytiri rides a tigress, and so resembles the Hindu goddess Durga, one of many resemblances to be found in Avatar,
Of the word "avatar" itself: avatar |ˈavəˌtär| noun chiefly Hinduism,
* a manifestation of a deity or released soul in bodily form on earth; an incarnate divine teacher.
* an incarnation, embodiment, or manifestation of a person or idea : The Sanskrit noun avatāra is derived from the verbal root tṝ "to cross over", combined with the prefix ava "off , away , down".
* Computing a movable icon representing a person in cyberspace or virtual reality graphics.
ORIGIN from Sanskrit avatāra ‘descent,’ from ava ‘down’ + tar- ‘to cross.’


And Jake indeed does turn out to be an avatar - though I see this in the second sense, above, mainly, due to his manifesting the energy of the mother goddess, Ewya, who is the total of consciousness related to the entire planet and it's organisms. It is through his contact with Ewya, balance and peace are restored.
Or, is the film merely an example of the third sense above, a result of computing, only - alas - virtual? I know what I believe.


(Deaf? hard of hearing? see http://www.captionfish.com/ to find a theater with captions.)


4 comments:

  1. one of the quieter, more nuanced, reads on Avatar that i have come across.


    i think your reading on the movie can be even more deeply "enwholened" by following through on the last question you ask... for its means and methods of production are nowhere near reducible to "merely" any more than the symbolic presentation of blue cat people can be "merely" reduced to cultural puppetry.

    ReplyDelete
  2. *The last question...I was perhaps taking a tiny jab at numerous "reviews" in which the authors can't see the forest for the trees - arguing as they do on such points as the sky being digitized, and therefore the film is a far lesser thing for it.
    *Another contrast to this question is to clarify an earlier point I made and say: the film itself is an avatar right now to humanity. This is intended by James Cameron, who described the film during his response to Al Gore's "An Inconvenient Truth" as a science fiction film with a conscience, depicting our culture's disconnect from a primary human responsibility: environmental stewardship.
    *Art created on the scale and in the context of Avatar
    must be a painful series of tradeoffs for James Cameron, but pulling off something that brings us to
    a place where we stop looking and SEE, stop hearing and LISTEN.. is like creating The Brooklyn Bridge or The Vietnam Veteran's Memorial: it offers opportunity
    to go somewhere and return better for the journey.
    *Reading the script, available online from Fox, leaves me pondering what effect would have followed from leaving in some of the scenes originally cut out. And I already am hoping for a "directors cut", such as was
    offered by Ridley Scott of Blade Runner
    *There was, for example, the love interest between Trudy and Norm that is only hinted at in the final version, but more provocative still - the fact that Trudy does a suicide attack on Quaritch's ship, smashing her 'copter into it, shearing off the cockpit,
    pilots and all. A much more dramatic end of Trudy than simply being blown out of the sky, and one that echoes her comment about martyrdom. But exactly for this reason maybe too strong for audiences in this day and age of explosive boxer shorts.
    *Another cut scene involves Tsu'Tey's neural queue being cut off , rendering him forever unable to connect to his horse, to a mate, etc., and subsequently asking Jake to kill him ceremoniously
    and end that misery (Cameron had to get rid of him somehow for Jake and Neytiri's sake). God knows what Freudian muck this scene would have prompted
    from reviewers.
    * And the food scene, was much longer, showing them eating beetles and such things; later, Jake and Neytiri caught and ate a fish. As a chef and someone who values the potential social value of eating, these
    are particularly missed scenes that would have added
    needed humor and insight into Na'Vi culture.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I'm doing my best to view this film/production from as many angles as possible. From one perspective, as an "ethnic display," it was *certainly* missing the Great Food Scene that is mandatory in all films about The Other - from Julie Dash's seaside feast in "Daughters of the Dust" to the Greek banquet in "My Big Fat..." to the shock dinner of "Temple of Doom."

    A scene of any kind of energy conversion - eating, excreting, etc., would have been infinitely valuable and "humanizing."

    I appreciate what you're pointing at in terms of a director's cut, but at the same time I can't help but feel a tad cynical. But then, who knows... Lucas, Speilberg and Cameron were some of the heavy hitters who practically forced digital projectors into the multiplexes. Maybe the Avatar Blu-Ray, coupled with the inevitable online roleplaying game, will force another revolution in the home...

    If Avatar really has sparked a kind of larval religion among people (check avatar-forums.com) then the unexpurgated version will maybe function as the first virtual talmud.

    But then, Octavia Butler tried with her "Earthseed" mythology to accomplish something similar...

    ah well...

    aside: i can('t) believe that McDonalds got the cross-promotion with Avatar. Like a forest-clearing Big Mac has anything to do with Na'vi culture!

    ReplyDelete
  4. A meal, energy conversion, (God is change?) would have been humanizing or Na'vitizing...yes. And I submit art on the scale of large studios films may spin off promotional trash as well as cults, games, and consumer trends as a matter of course and yet retain a sphere of influence as art. Picasso's Guernica, Oprah's tv show, the photo of earth coming back from the moon, totem poles of the people of the Pacific northwest....all in some manner work as allegory, as
    visual art, to move people emotionally. A good story,
    mythology, changes those who come to know it; the visual impact of artwork like Avatar - despite all
    the lesser cultural paraphernalia that attaches to it -
    has the potential to change people for the better, perhaps by making the message more memorable or
    connected to the life of the viewer. For that reason, I
    choose to trust James Cameron and choose for myself to set aside cynicism. But then, I am a dreamer so maybe it is not that hard for me.

    ReplyDelete